What is project leadership? Project Managers manage
project and people. This role requires management and leadership skills where
the emphasize lies on managing the project data and leading the project team.
Couple days ago, I attended the Project Management
Symposium in Philippines and I listened to a very interesting presentation
about Project Leadership by Dr. Shaligram Pokharel and I learned many valuable
things from him. He said that as a leader, you have to create the value and as
a PM, you have to create a group leader. To be a great leader you should have
respect, trust and commitment. Leaders should set themselves by example and you
need to show your team that you can do it. Yes, that is right. It’s a leader
not a boss.
Remember the difference between a boss and a leader;
a boss says GO! and the leader says LET’S GO! –E.M. Kelly-
As a leader, in order your team follow your
direction, you have to show to them that you already did the right things. You
also have to be a visionary and help people to reach their goal. You cannot
only direct them to do their task, but you have to support and facilitate them.
Shaligram also said that leaders have to prepare, do hard work and learn from
failure. I am not saying that I am good leader, but when I was assigned as a
project leader, I did harder than my team, I also learned from the previous
leader failures of similar project. Because the previous leader did not set her
self as an example, she was lucky enough that most of her team is creative,
responsible and hard working that did not need to be supervised. She failed to
lead us her team member, she even had a light conflict with her team. So, what
I learned from this failure, I was trying to make sure my team members work
together in different side. I was not worry about the fail but I prevented that
it won’t happen again.
That’s only a story about one of my experience. Now
let’s talk about common leadership styles. Management and leadership style can
vary. Some of them are:
Charismatic: Charismatic Leaders posses a very
persuasive personality that attracts followers through charm. These leaders
show great confidence in their followers and create a group image that is far
superior to all others.
Participative: Participative Leaders seek to involve
other people in the decision process, possibly including subordinates, peers,
superiors and other stakeholders.
Situational: Situational Leaders do not just have a
single preferred leadership style. Factors that affect situational decisions
include motivation and capability of followers.
Transactional: Transactional leaders create clear
structures that make clear what is required of their subordinates. These
leaders reward subordinates who following orders. When things go wrong, then
the subordinates are considered to be personally at fault, and are punished for
their failure.
Transformational: Transformational leaders have a
vision for the future that will excite and convert potential followers. These
leaders try to convince others of their vision. They are always visible and act
as role model. They also make continued efforts to motivate and rally their
followers, constantly doing the rounds, listening, soothing and enthusing.
Autocratic: Autocratic leaders make decisions without
consulting with others or considering any other view.
Democratic: Democratic leaders involve all people in
the decision-making, although the process for the final decision may vary from
the leader having the final say to them facilitating consensus in the group.
Laissez Faire: Leaders with a Laissez Faire
leadership style minimize their involvement in decision-making, and hence
allowing people to make their own decisions, although they may still be
responsible for the outcome.
Leaders can adapt to different styles but need to
make sure to stay their true self. So which one are you? Kippenberger states
“how we lead is a reflection of our own character, personally and experience.”
Leaders need to understand who they are in order to be able to adapt to
different leadership styles. Projects with their unpredictable nature require
leaders that are able to adapt to different leadership styles.
Project management is a team-based approach. Hence
the project scope and project plan cannot be defined and developed in
isolation. Autocratic leaders would come up with a plan for the team without
consulting the team members. Leaders with a laissez faire leadership style
would let the team figure out how to respond to the challenges of a project
without providing any guidelines. Although leadership styles like the
autocratic or laissez faire leadership behaviour can be observed in some
organization they are not well suited for leading projects and project team
members.
Democratic leaders go through an elaborate decision
finding process that involves several stakeholders of different organizational
background and levels. As a result democratic leadership behaviour often leads
to extreme delays in large projects, because all team members get involved in
every decision process of a project. The more people are part of a project team
the longer it takes until a decision is made.
Charismatic leadership works often well at the
beginning of a project when it is important to get support from the overall
organization. Charismatic leaders are driven by their believe that their vision
is correct. Hence Charismatic leadership works as long as the leader’s vision
is aligned with the project and organizational goals.
Participative, situational, transactional and
transformational leadership styles seem to work most effective when managing
projects and leading people. Participative leaders typically seek other people
views and opinions in order to form their own opinion about a situation and
then make their decision. Project sponsors, for example, often make their
decision after listening to multiple people in the organization. Blanchard describes
the situational leadership model which includes four different leadership
behaviours that are dependent on the maturity and knowledge of the employee.
These are telling, coaching, supporting, and delegating. Project teams include
members of different backgrounds and experiences requiring different management
styles. Situational leadership seems to fit the changing nature of a project
very well. Burns differentiates between transactional and transformational
leadership behaviours. Transactional leaders communicate clear goals to their
subordinates. This leadership style relies on organizational structures and processes
to help resolve problems. Well organized projects have a structure in place
that allows the project teams to solve problems. Transactional leadership works
well for some aspects of a project such as e.g.: managing changes through a
change management committee. Transformational leadership style empowers people
to do their work. Transformational leaders facilitate the process of people to
learn and to seek change and improvement [6]. In general this leadership style
is most applicable for organizations that manage projects through self-managed
teams.
References:
1. InterGlobe Consulting contact: info@interglobeconsulting.com
2. KOPPENSTEINER S., Leadership concepts in software
project management, proceedings of IDIMT 2008, Czech Republic.
3. CHANGINGMINDS.ORG, website http://changingminds.org/disciplines/leadership/styles/leadership_styles.htm,
2008.
4. GOLEMAN, website http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_goleman_leadership_styles.html
, 2008.
5. KIPPENBERGER T., Leadership Styles, Capstone
Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2002.
6. BLANCHARD K., Management of Organizational Behavior:
Leading Human Resources, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 2000.
7. MACGREGOR BURNS J., Leadership, Harpercollins, New
York, USA, 1979.
8.
BYHAM W.C., ZAPP
The lightening of Empowerment, Ballantine Publishing Group, Toronto, Canada,
1998.